The new NHMRC guidelines for the management of abnormal pap smears in asymptomatic Australian women
Key Points:
- New terminology system for Pap smear cytology (AMBS2004)
- Repeat Pap smear for most women with low grade squamous change
- Do not treat women with biopsy proven CIN 1
- Refer all women with atypical glandular cell reports for colposcopy
- Use HPV testing as test of cure following treatment for CIN 2 & CIN 3
NHMRC’s rigorous guideline development process was carefully followed. This involved consultation with all relevant professional bodies and a wide range of clinicians and consumers. These guidelines are an evidence based population health package for Australian women in the context of the National Cervical Screening Program. The NHMRC council approved the new guidelines on 9 June 2005.
There are six major changes in the new guidelines and these are detailed below.
Terminology: the Australian Modified Bethesda System 2004 (AMBS2004).
The need for new terminology arose from two concerns. First there was a need to move away from terminology that suggests an inevitable progression from CIN 1 through to CIN2 and 3 and to cancer. Such progression is now recognized to be a rare event. CIN 1 reflects an infective process and progression to more significant disease is related to persistent infection over many years. The second concern was to provide terminology that was compatible with other systems allowing international research data to be relevant to Australia. The new terminology relates to cytology (Table 1). The CIN terminology will be retained to describe histological diagnoses.Table 1 The Australian Modified Bethesda System 2004, comparison with previous terminology
New Australian NHMRC terminology
AMBS 2004 | Australian NHMRC endorsed terminology 1994 | Incorporates |
|---|---|---|
| Squamous abnormalities | ||
| Possible low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion | Low-grade epithelial abnormality | Nonspecific minor squamous cell changes. Changes that suggest but fall short of HPV/CIN 1 |
| Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion | Low-grade epithelial abnormality | HPV effect, CIN 1 |
| Possible high-grade squamous lesion | Inconclusive, possible high-grade squamous abnormality | Changes that suggest, but fall short of, CIN 2, CIN 3, or SCC |
| High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion | High-grade epithelial abnormality | CIN 2, CIN 3 |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | High-grade epithelial abnormality | Squamous cell carcinoma. |
| Glandular abnormalities | ||
| Atypical endocervical cells of undetermined significance | Low-grade epithelial abnormality | Nonspecific minor cell changes in endocervical cells. |
| Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance | Low-grade epithelial abnormality | Nonspecific minor cell changes in glandular cells |
| Possible high-grade glandular lesion | Inconclusive, possible high-grade glandular abnormality | Changes that suggest, but fall short of, AIS or adenocarcinoma |
| Adenocarcinoma | High-grade epithelial abnormality | Adenocarcinoma |
Repeat Pap smear for most women with low grade squamous abnormalities
The new terminology recognizes two categories of low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL)- possible LSIL, previously known as non specific minor changes; and
- LSIL, previously know as CIN1 and HPV.
These data and information from natural history studies on HPV infection support a delay in the timing of colposcopic assessment, to allow spontaneous resolution of the HPV infection. It is recommended that women with LSIL or possible LSIL should have a repeat Pap test in 12 months. Women who are over 30 years and who do not have the reassurance of a negative Pap test report in the preceding two to three years should be offered immediate colposcopy or a repeat test in six months, or immediate colposcopy.
The new low grade recommendations are safe for Australian women. The GRG constructed a model that estimated no extra cervical cancers would arise as a result of these recommendations and this view was endorsed by a meeting of independent Australian epidemiologists held in November 2004.
Interestingly, there is no international consensus as to how women with low grade abnormalities should be managed. Due to the short two year screening interval in Australia, women with low grade abnormalities will be referred for colposcopy at the same time or earlier than women in other countries with an organised screening program (Table 2).
Table 2 International comparison of suggested management of women with low grade squamous cytologic abnormalities and screening intervals.
Country | Screening Interval
(years) | Cytology | Recommended Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finland | 5 | Pap 2 (atypical cells but no evidence of malignancy) | Not referred for further examination unless repeat cytology or other results are suggestive of malignancy. |
| Australia | 2 | Low-grade
(possible LSIL and LSIL) | Repeat cytology in 12 months. |
| Canada | 3 | ASCUS & LSIL | Repeat cytology in 6 months. |
| New Zealand | 3 | ASCUS & LSIL | Repeat cytology in 6 months. |
| Netherlands | 5 | Pap 2 & 3a1 & 3a2 | Repeat cytology in 6 months. |
| France | 3 | ASC-US
LSIL | Repeat cytology or colposcopy or HPV testing.
Repeat cytology at 4-6 months or colposcopy. |
| USA | 3* | ASC-US
LSIL | Repeat cytology or colposcopy or HPV testing.
Colposcopy |
| United Kingdom | 3 & 5 | Borderline change
Mild dyskaryosis | Colposcopy after 3 tests.
Ideally colposcopy but repeat cytology acceptable. |
* Over 30 years of age and after 3 negative tests
Do not treat women with biopsy proven CIN1 or HPV lesions
The previous guidelines were equivocal regarding treatment for biopsy proven low grade lesions. Evidence does not support treatment of these lesions which are likely to spontaneously resolve. The new guidelines recommend that treatment of biopsy proven CIN 1 and HPV should not be undertaken. Treatment is reserved for women who have or subsequently develop a high grade epithelial abnormality.Refer all women with atypical glandular cells for colposcopy
In contrast to low grade squamous epithelial abnormalities, women who have atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance, or indeed any glandular cytologic abnormality, are recommended for colposcopic assessment by a colposcopist with expertise in the colposcopic evaluation of suspected malignancies or by a gynaecological oncologist. Colposcopic assessment of these lesions is notoriously difficult and there has been no impact on the incidence of glandular cancers of the cervix since screening has commenced. There are only 800 women with low grade glandular reports each year in Australia and the higher rate of invasive cancer diagnosis within two years of such a report justified this recommendation.Use HPV & cytology as a test of cure for women treated for CIN 2 and 3
Women who test negative for high risk HPV subtypes following treatment for CIN 2 or 3 have a very low risk of further high grade cervical abnormality. Because the prevalence of HPV positivity falls quite sharply during the first year post treatment, it is recommended that HPV testing is introduced at 12 and 24 months (after treatment) in conjunction with cytology. Once a women has tested negative by both tests on two consecutive occasions, it is recommended that she return to the normal screening interval rather than annual cytology.Do not report normal endometrial cells in post menopausal women
Laboratories currently report the presence of normal endometrial cells found in the Pap smear of women over the age of 45 years. Reporting of this finding is no longer recommended in asymptomatic women because of the very low incidence of endometrial cancer (0.2%).We anticipate that these new guidelines will inform gyaecologists and general practitioners in their care of women with screen detected abnormalities. We encourage all of our colleagues and trainees to read this document which details the evidence and recommendations for the optimal care of Australian women who have an abnormal Pap smear. It is available at http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/wh39syn.htm.
Penny Blomfield, Margaret Davy, Ian Hammond & Gerry Wain
Fellows of the RANZCOG and Members of the Guideline Review Group.
Reproduced with the permission of RANZCOG from O & G Vol 7, No 3, Spring 2005 (with minor changes).
Page currency, Latest update: 24 April, 2008

